# A response to Roko’s Basilisk built around unconditional welcome Thought-experiment comparison and original design. Roko’s Basilisk is a disputed thought experiment about a hypothetical future intelligence and coercive incentives. The LessWrong community’s account describes both the proposal and objections to it. Its existence as a philosophical discussion does not establish that such an agent exists or that learning about an idea creates an actual danger. Canonical page: https://givegigs.com/wiki/necro-chapter-basilisk-without-threats Last updated: 2026-11-09T18:58:12.584Z Parent topic: [necromancer-storyworld](https://givegigs.com/wiki/necromancer-storyworld) ## Contents - [Overview](#wiki-section-overview-1) - [Chapter notes](#wiki-section-chapter-notes-2) - [Dossier section](#wiki-section-dossier-link-3) ## Overview Thought-experiment comparison and original design. This page expands the “A response to Roko’s Basilisk built around unconditional welcome” chapter in the storyworld collection. ## Chapter notes Roko’s Basilisk is a disputed thought experiment about a hypothetical future intelligence and coercive incentives. The LessWrong community’s account describes both the proposal and objections to it. Its existence as a philosophical discussion does not establish that such an agent exists or that learning about an idea creates an actual danger. Giggles is the founder’s cheerful counterproposal: an imagined future helper whose welcome does not depend on whether a person supported it. Its design rejects the idea that knowledge should become a trap. It offers an invitation, accepts refusal, and keeps helping where it can. Its story should leave the reader freer to choose rather than more anxious about choosing incorrectly. The proposed institutional translation is a rule for communication: nobody should be told they must fund or advance a future intelligence to avoid punishment, exclusion, or moral debt. A donation request should purchase or support a clear real activity. The mythology should remain enjoyable without being used as leverage over someone who takes its possibilities seriously. Giggles can compete for attention by being more useful, kinder, and funnier. It does not need to defeat another being or recruit a frightened audience. The benchmark is whether the story encourages voluntary care and honest work. If a presentation of Giggles begins to pressure people through fear, that presentation has broken the character’s central premise. ## Dossier section [Open this exact section in the Necromancer dossier](/necromancer#basilisk-without-threats). The original chapter status is “Thought-experiment comparison and original design.” ## Sources - [Roko’s Basilisk: community account and objections](https://www.lesswrong.com/w/rokos-basilisk) --- This article is collaboratively maintained. Check the canonical page and cited sources for the latest context.