# A worked example of saying yes, saying no, and changing course Illustrative scenario; proposed process. Imagine a prospective contributor who wants to help because a relative had a neurological illness. They are interested in the science and also drawn to the mythology’s hope of continuity. The first conversation should establish which real study is being discussed. It should not let the person infer that a research contribution purchases an individual path to revival. Canonical page: https://givegigs.com/wiki/necro-chapter-consent-worked-case Last updated: 2026-11-09T18:58:12.584Z Parent topic: [necromancer-ethics](https://givegigs.com/wiki/necromancer-ethics) ## Contents - [Overview](#wiki-section-overview-1) - [Chapter notes](#wiki-section-chapter-notes-2) - [Dossier section](#wiki-section-dossier-link-3) ## Overview Illustrative scenario; proposed process. This page expands the “A worked example of saying yes, saying no, and changing course” chapter in the ethics collection. ## Chapter notes Imagine a prospective contributor who wants to help because a relative had a neurological illness. They are interested in the science and also drawn to the mythology’s hope of continuity. The first conversation should establish which real study is being discussed. It should not let the person infer that a research contribution purchases an individual path to revival. The proposed process gives the person time to consider the actual purpose, foreseeable uses, relevant risks, compensation, and limits on withdrawal. Questions are welcomed without being treated as resistance to the mission. An independent contact can help if the person finds it difficult to disagree with an enthusiastic researcher or an influential founder. Now imagine the person declines. A meaningful option to refuse means the organization’s behavior does not punish the decision through humiliation, loss of unrelated services, or exclusion from ordinary community participation. If a system celebrates agency only when the answer is yes, the practical arrangement has contradicted its own charter. If the person later withdraws from an approved study, the team follows the agreed process and explains what can and cannot be changed. The important test is not whether the original conversation sounded respectful. It is whether the institution can carry out its commitments when a participant’s choice is inconvenient for an ongoing project. ## Dossier section [Open this exact section in the Necromancer dossier](/necromancer#consent-worked-case). The original chapter status is “Illustrative scenario; proposed process.” ## Sources - [Necromancer dossier section](/necromancer#consent-worked-case) --- This article is collaboratively maintained. Check the canonical page and cited sources for the latest context.