# A worked example of a promising project with an ecological cost Illustrative planning scenario. Imagine two proposed research approaches appear capable of addressing the same bounded question. One depends on a resource-intensive workflow; the other is less demanding but may provide a weaker measurement. The Lichen commitment does not supply an automatic answer. It requires the team to make the scientific and ecological comparison explicit rather than treat one type of value as invisible. Canonical page: https://givegigs.com/wiki/necro-chapter-ecological-budget-case Last updated: 2026-11-09T18:58:12.584Z Parent topic: [necromancer-neuroscience](https://givegigs.com/wiki/necromancer-neuroscience) ## Contents - [Overview](#wiki-section-overview-1) - [Chapter notes](#wiki-section-chapter-notes-2) - [Dossier section](#wiki-section-dossier-link-3) ## Overview Illustrative planning scenario. This page expands the “A worked example of a promising project with an ecological cost” chapter in the neuroscience collection. ## Chapter notes Imagine two proposed research approaches appear capable of addressing the same bounded question. One depends on a resource-intensive workflow; the other is less demanding but may provide a weaker measurement. The Lichen commitment does not supply an automatic answer. It requires the team to make the scientific and ecological comparison explicit rather than treat one type of value as invisible. Druids identify relevant living-system concerns and seek appropriate outside expertise. Artificers describe the equipment and resource dependencies. Wizards explain which differences could change the validity of the study. Fighters report what can actually be maintained. The review should distinguish measured effects, estimates, and unknowns so that an apparently precise comparison does not conceal incompatible assumptions. The decision could be to use the lower-impact approach, narrow the question, improve a measurement, or justify the more demanding option with explicit conditions. What matters is that the justification addresses the alternative rather than simply declaring the project too important to question. A mission about the future does not make its present resource choices exempt from scrutiny. The resulting record should explain the choice and identify what would lead the company to revisit it. If the assumptions later change, the team should update the decision. Lichen gains a role in governance through this process, not through an unsupported claim that the organization has measured the health of Earth’s psychic field. ## Dossier section [Open this exact section in the Necromancer dossier](/necromancer#ecological-budget-case). The original chapter status is “Illustrative planning scenario.” ## Sources - [Necromancer dossier section](/necromancer#ecological-budget-case) --- This article is collaboratively maintained. Check the canonical page and cited sources for the latest context.