# Prepare for outcomes instead of declaring destiny Conditional scenarios, not predictions. Scenario one: the resurrection ambition remains out of reach, but research tools become useful. The company should be able to survive by solving an independently valuable measurement problem and publishing what it learns. Evidence of success would be reproducible results and collaborators who can use the methods, not a growing mythology or an audience that believes harder. Canonical page: https://givegigs.com/wiki/necro-chapter-future-scenarios Last updated: 2026-11-09T18:58:11.921Z Parent topic: [necromancer-neuroscience](https://givegigs.com/wiki/necromancer-neuroscience) ## Contents - [Overview](#wiki-section-overview-1) - [Chapter notes](#wiki-section-chapter-notes-2) - [Dossier section](#wiki-section-dossier-link-3) ## Overview Conditional scenarios, not predictions. This page expands the “Prepare for outcomes instead of declaring destiny” chapter in the neuroscience collection. ## Chapter notes Scenario one: the resurrection ambition remains out of reach, but research tools become useful. The company should be able to survive by solving an independently valuable measurement problem and publishing what it learns. Evidence of success would be reproducible results and collaborators who can use the methods, not a growing mythology or an audience that believes harder. Scenario two: neural repair improves while access remains unequal. The central challenge then becomes who benefits, how risks are distributed, and whether increased capability deepens dependence. The proposed charter should already contain a process for access decisions, conflict review, and participant representation. A future technical advance would increase the importance of these questions rather than resolve them automatically. Scenario three: some biological systems develop capabilities that make their moral status harder to assess. The response would be stronger inquiry and oversight, with authority to pause work. Scenario four: the consciousness-cloud premise yields no testable evidence. The venture should say so, update its claims, and preserve the distinction between a meaningful philosophy and a demonstrated physical mechanism. Being right about the future requires a method for noticing when the forecast is wrong. Necromancer’s proposed practice is a dated assumptions register: the claim, the evidence, the uncertainty, what would change the decision, and the next review. The project can keep an extraordinary mission while making ordinary, accountable decisions about the next experiment, contract, and dollar. ## Dossier section [Open this exact section in the Necromancer dossier](/necromancer#future-scenarios). The original chapter status is “Conditional scenarios, not predictions.” ## Sources - [Necromancer dossier section](/necromancer#future-scenarios) --- This article is collaboratively maintained. Check the canonical page and cited sources for the latest context.